- Various events – starting with the upcoming Italian referendum on its Senate and elections in the Netherlands, France and Germany next year – will no doubt keep Eurozone break-up fears alive.
- However, even if the “No” vote wins in the Italian election (as polls suggest likely) a lot would have to happen for an Italian exit from the Eurozone to occur.
- More broadly there are good reasons for thinking that the Eurozone is different and a populist driven break-up will continue to not happen.
- If so, periods of market turmoil driven by ongoing bouts of break-up risk in Europe should continue to be seen as buying opportunities for investors.
After the recent experience with the Brexit vote in the UK and election of Donald Trump as President of the US which are indicative of a nationalist backlash against the pro-globalisation establishment, there is a fear that Europe will go the same way with nationalist forces in Italy, Austria, France, Germany, etc, triggering a break-up of the Eurozone. Of course a break-up of the Eurozone has the potential to be a more traumatic event than the UK leaving the European Union or the change of Presidency in the US. This is because currencies would have to be re-denominated and borrowing costs pushed up in more heavily indebted peripheral Eurozone countries to reflect a likely sharp decline in the value of their new currencies, which would likely trigger a recession in them. At the same time the weakening of key European export markets would be bad for Germany. The threat of which could cause a return to the sort of global financial volatility we have seen during various flare-ups of the Eurozone public debt crisis since 2010, most recently in mid-2015 with worries about Greece (remember Grexit !)
Some see a Eurozone break-up as inevitable, but is it really?
Event risk in Europe to keep break up risk in focus
The next 12 months are scattered with numerous events in the Eurozone that risk adding to investor concerns about a break-up: the Austrian presidential election re-run and Italian Senate referendum both to occur this coming Sunday; parliamentary elections in the Netherlands in March 2017; the presidential election in France in late April/early May and parliamentary elections in June; German general elections around September; and of course ongoing risks regarding Greece.
Opinion polls in Austria are pointing to the election of the populist right wing candidate Norbert Hofer and Italian opinion polls are pointing to a “No” vote in the Senate referendum (designed to reduce the power of the Senate and make Italy more governable) which would thwart PM Matteo Renzi’s reform agenda which in turn could see him resign with fears that this will lead to an early election with the Euro-sceptic Five Star Movement (5SM) winning, calling a referendum on Italy's membership of the Eurozone which would then see Italy move to leave (Itexit). The political uncertainty that could be unleashed by an Italian “No” vote also risks throwing the recapitalisation of several Italian banks into turmoil which could threaten already weak economic growth further boosting support for 5SM. Reflecting all this Italian bond yields have risen from 1.1% to 2% over the last six months compared to a rise from -0.09% to 0.2% in Germany. In other words investors are demanding a higher premium again to lend to Italy for fear its Euro debt will be redenominated into lower value Liras.
However, a lot of water would have to pass under the bridge for Austria or Italy to leave the Eurozone. Firstly, I guess if after Brexit and Trump you no longer trust opinion polls you could argue that there is nothing to worry about as Nofer will lose the Austrian election and the “Yes” vote will win in Italy! (Actually the polls did an ok job on Brexit and Trump – it was the betting markets that were way out!) More fundamentally though, after marginally losing the first Austrian presidential election in May, Hofer has backed down on most of his anti-Euro rhetoric (no doubt in order to win the election) and so if he wins it wouldn’t mean an Ausexit (Austrian exit from the Euro) any time soon. Italy is more significant though but the Senate referendum's failure would just mean messy politics as normal in Italy (either under Renzi or an alternative). However, it’s unlikely there will be an election before the due date in 2018, and even if there was it’s not clear that 5SM would win. And even if 5SM were to win and call a referendum on Italy's membership of the Euro (which would first require a constitutional change), a majority of Italians support staying in the Euro.
Europe could be different
Looking at the big picture there are several reasons for thinking that Europe might be different – that a populist driven break-up won’t happen. First, Europe does not have the same issues with inequality that has driven the "leftist" backlash in the UK and US, which has helped fuel nationalist anger. It never really had the lurch to laissez-faire economics that Anglo countries saw in the 1980s and so has maintained a large social welfare state. This has helped redistribute the benefits of globalisation such that inequality has remained well below US and UK levels, as can be seen in the next chart which shows Gini coefficients (a measure of income inequality) are below average in Europe.
Source: OECD, AMP Capital
Second, Eurozone break-up risk is nothing new and arguably peaked just after the high point of the Eurozone debt crisis (which at its core was all about break-up risk) a few years ago when austerity and unemployment were at their peak. Now austerity has largely ended and unemployment is falling.
Third, despite the media excitement (made worse in Anglo countries who would love to see the Eurozone collapse) the increase in support for Euro-sceptic populists following Brexit and Trump has not really been overwhelming (next chart).
Source: Bloomberg (from various polls), AMP Capital
- Following Brexit, Spain has seen reduced support for far left Podemos in favour of the governing People’s Party.
- Support for Le Pen and the National Front in France is stuck around 30% and has actually been in decline since 2013. She will likely win the first round of the presidential election in April (which will involve multiple candidates) but lose the second round run-off between the top two particularly with a strong centre-right candidate in the form of François Fillon seeing support of around 65-70%.
- The Dutch Eurosceptic Party for Freedom has seen support decline this year – perhaps as the immigration crisis has faded - such that it may only get 10% support in March.
- The Five Star Movement in Italy looks to have peaked in the polls, and polls less than the governing party.
- Alternative for Deutschland only gets about 15% support, and Angela Merkel’s decision to run for a fourth term adds to confidence a centrist government will remain in Germany
Fourth, support in mainland Europe for the Eurozone remains high. In the Netherlands its 75%, in France it’s around 67% and in Italy it’s around 55%. Basically the populists have to ditch anti-Euro policies if they wish to govern. Just look at Syriza in Greece which has gone from being a far left Euro-sceptic party to just another European centrist political party.
The commitment of continental Europeans to Europe and the Euro is arguably more about politics than economics. It’s rooted in being part of a stronger whole and a desire to avoid a return to the conflict that prevailed up until WW2. In part reflecting this, mainland Europeans are far more likely to see themselves as European than the British ever did. See next chart.
Source: Eurobarometer, AMP Capital
Perhaps the two main pressure points in Europe beyond slow economic growth are the migration crisis and fiscal austerity. But the migration crisis is abating as sea arrivals have collapsed from over 200,000 a month in October 2015 to below 3000 recently with mainstream governments now taking a tougher line on it. Meanwhile, fiscal austerity in Europe largely ended in 2013 (see the next chart) with the European Commission now recommending that member countries with fiscal space adopt a more expansionary fiscal stance.
Source: IMF Fiscal Monitor, AMP Capital
Implications for investors
There are several implications for investors. First, various events – the upcoming Austrian election & the Italian referendum and 2017 elections in the Netherlands, France and Germany – will no doubt keep Eurozone break-up fears alive causing periodic short term investment market volatility.
Second, a “No” vote in Italy with risks for Italian banks along with political risk through next year will add to pressure on the European Central Bank to extend its quantitative easing program (and possibly step up Italian bond purchases). Which in turn will maintain downwards pressure on the Euro.
Finally, if we are right and the Eurozone continues to hang together then bouts of financial turmoil triggered by break-up fears are buying opportunities – just as we have seen since the Eurozone debt crisis began in 2010.
More broadly, after their post Trump rally shares have become overbought and vulnerable to various events coming up over the next few weeks (Italian referendum, ECB and Fed meetings), but after a pause shares are likely to resume their rally into year-end helped by reasonable valuations, continuing easy global monetary conditions, the prospect of fiscal stimulus in the US, a shift from falling to rising profits and the usual “Santa Claus” rally that kicks in around mid-December.
Important note: While every care has been taken in the preparation of this article, AMP Capital Investors Limited (ABN 59 001 777 591, AFSL 232497) and AMP Capital Funds Management Limited (ABN 15 159 557 721, AFSL 426455) makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of any statement in it including, without limitation, any forecasts. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. This article has been prepared for the purpose of providing general information, without taking account of any particular investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. An investor should, before making any investment decisions, consider the appropriateness of the information in this article, and seek professional advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation and needs. This article is solely for the use of the party to whom it is provided.