Investment markets and key developments over the past week
Share markets fell over the last week on the back of geopolitical concerns, with Democrats opening an impeachment inquiry into President Trump, ongoing trade war uncertainties and more Brexit mayhem at the same time that global business conditions PMIs remained soft. For the week, US shares fell 1%, Eurozone shares lost 0.6%, Japanese shares fell 0.7% and Chinese shares lost 2.1%. Australian shares were dragged lower by the poor global lead with telcos and resources stocks down sharply but with real estate, IT and consumer discretionary stocks helping to limit the decline over the week to 0.2%. Reflecting the risk off tone bond yields also fell. The oil price fell 3.8% and has almost fully reversed its spike on the back of the attack on Saudi oil production, and the copper price rose slightly. The Australian dollar slipped as the US dollar rose.
The US/China trade war saga continued to impact markets over the last week with alternating positive and negative news mostly emanating from the US side, in particular that talks look set to resume in the US in the second week of October but then on Friday that the US is considering limits on portfolio investment flows into China. Hopefully the latter is just kite flying. If not, it will just exacerbate the trade war, take us back to the dark age of capital controls and invite China to do the same – which will be interesting because it’s the US that’s dependent on capital inflows, not China!
The impeachment inquiry of President Trump adds to the risks around share markets (which would probably prefer to see Trump remain as President) but is unlikely to have a big impact. After resisting calls for impeachment for some time (because the evidence wasn’t strong enough in relation to the Russian interference issue), US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi finally relented in relation to Trump’s request over the phone to the Ukrainian President to investigate Joe Biden on the grounds that it’s a violation of the US constitution. The process is simple – if the House votes for impeachment it then goes to the Senate where a two thirds majority is necessary to remove the President from office. There are several reasons not to be too concerned.
- First, comparisons to Nixon and Clinton are complicated by the OPEC crisis and the LTCM crisis/tech boom respectively, but through Clinton’s impeachment process (8 Oct 1998 to his Senate acquittal on 12 Feb 1999) US shares rose 28%, highlighting that an impeachment process is not necessarily bad for shares.
- Second, while the Democrats control the House and only need a simple majority to impeach, the Republicans control the Senate and they are unlikely to vote to remove Trump from office, particularly if there is no evidence linking Trump’s request to the Ukraine President with US aid to Ukraine.
- Third, the impeachment may actually shore up support for Trump as his supporters may see it as a witch hunt. The same occurred for Clinton in 1998 and in fact the backlash against the Republicans for bringing impeachment charges against Clinton saw them lose seats in Congress in the November 1998 mid-terms, whereas prior to the impeachment they were on track to win big time.
- Fourth, the scandal has boosted support for left wing Elizabeth Warren at the expense of centrist Joe Biden, but she polls less favourably against Trump than Biden does.
- Fifth, it may make Trump more motivated to reach a deal with China on trade to show that he is getting on with the job and to reduce the risk of recession (which would see support for him fall).
- Finally, the even worse relationship between Democrats and Republicans may make it harder to get cooperation on things like drug pricing, but all the big market friendly policies Trump had to offer have already been done.
The UK Supreme Court determination that PM Johnson’s suspension of parliament was unlawful adds an episode to the Brexit comedy but probably doesn’t change things much from the parliamentary intervention a few weeks ago: a no-deal Brexit is looking unlikely and new delay is looking certain.
Is China now a developed country such that it should face World Trade Organisation trade rules that apply to developed countries? It may have grown rapidly and may be big due to its 1.4 billion population but this does not make it a developed country. China’s per capita GDP is just US$9,608 according to the IMF. If China is to be classified as a developed country as opposed to emerging, then so too should Mexico with per capita GDP of US$9,807, Russia with US$11,327 and Argentina with $11,627. But that would hardly seem fair given than developed countries like the US have per capita GDP of US$62,606 and Australia has US$56,352.
Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) RBA Governor Philip Lowe wasn’t as dovish as maybe some had expected but his “An Economic Update” speech left the door wide open for more rate cuts. Governor Lowe remains optimistic that the Australian economy has seen a “gentle turning point” but his comments around increasing downside risks to global growth, weaker than expected GDP growth, spare capacity in the labour market, a stalling in the pick-up in wages growth, it being “not unreasonable” to expect further easing and that markets should be surprised if the RBA didn’t “act consistent with our mandate” are all very dovish. We remain of the view that the RBA will cut rates again on Tuesday and now see the low point being 0.25% in February next year – see the outlook section below. It’s also worth noting that the Prime Minister has indicated a willingness to look at budget stimulus at the mid-year budget review (MYEFO) in December and in the May Budget. So, it’s not a case of either stimulus or surplus.
Australian petrol prices up more than the oil price. Since the attacks on Saudi oil production the world oil price has increased by around US$2 a barrel, which is nothing more than normal volatility in oil prices. Given the fall in the Australian dollar over the same period, this translates to a rise of around 3 cents a litre and yet average petrol prices are up from 143 cents a litre to now 152 cents a litre. In many Sydney suburbs they have spiked to a record 173.9 cents per litre for unleaded. Someone must be making a bit of extra profit here under cover of the attacks, even though the impact on the world oil price has been trivial!
Major global economic events and implications
US data was mixed with a small rise in September business conditions PMIs, better than expected gains in durable goods orders, gains in home prices and continuing low jobless claims but soft personal spending in August and a fall in consumer confidence. Consumer confidence remains high but a key risk would be if the fall in business confidence and capex plans over the last year translates into reduced employment and hence consumer spending. Meanwhile, the core private final consumption deflator inflation rose to 1.8% year-on-year in August which is just below the Fed’s 2% inflation target.
Eurozone business conditions and economic sentiment were weak in September with another leg down, but at least the German IFO business survey improved slightly and bank lending growth was okay.
Japanese business conditions PMIs also fell slightly in September although they are still up from levels seen through the first half.
Australian economic events and implications
It was a quiet week for Australian economic data but both skilled job vacancies and the ABS measure of economy wide job vacancies fell (led by NSW and Victoria) pointing to slower jobs growth ahead and a further rise in unemployment. What’s more, ABS employment data by industry shows that all of the jobs growth in Australia over the last year has come from the public sector – which perhaps explains why jobs growth has been so strong relative to weak GDP growth. The CBA’s business conditions PMIs rose in September, but they tend to be a bit volatile and they are still well down from 2017 highs.
Meanwhile, it’s worth noting that the pick-up in auction clearance rates that has occurred in Sydney and Melbourne this year is now being accompanied by higher listings and sales suggesting that it has legs. Key to watch for now will be whether clearance rates continue to hold up as the spring selling season heats up and whether housing finance commitments continue to rise. Our assessment remains that after a further bounce price gains will be constrained through next year, due to still tighter lending standards, unit supply, slow growth and rising unemployment.
What to watch over the next week?
In the US, the key focus will likely be on September jobs data to be released Friday which is expected to show a 140,000 gain in payrolls, unemployment remaining low at 3.7% and wages growth remaining around 3.2% year-on-year. But before we get to that, expect the September manufacturing conditions ISM (Tuesday) to rise slightly to 50.5 to be more in line with the Markit PMI but the non-manufacturing conditions ISM (Thursday) to fall slightly but to a still solid reading of 55. Trade data will also be released Friday.
In the Eurozone, unemployment (Monday) in August is likely to have remained at 7.5% and core inflation (Tuesday) for September is likely to have remained around 0.9% year-on-year.
The Japanese jobs market (Tuesday) is likely to have remained tight in August but the September Tankan business survey (also Tuesday) is likely to deteriorate slightly.
China’s business conditions PMIs (Monday) are expected to track sideways around the 50 level for manufacturers.
In Australia, the RBA is expected to cut the cash rate to a new record low of 0.75% on Tuesday, making it the third rate cut this year. Economic growth has slowed well below potential and RBA forecasts, unemployment and underemployment are now drifting up, forward labour market indicators point to a further rise in unemployment ahead, the improvement in wages growth has stalled and inflation looks likely to continue coming in weaker than expected. What’s more the RBA’s own forecasts, which see it continuing to undershoot its inflation target through 2020, are built on two more rate cuts and recent comments by Governor Lowe have left the door wide open for more rate cuts. So best to get on to it. We see the RBA cutting rates by 0.25% on Tuesday with another 0.25% cut coming in November. We had thought that the low would be 0.5%, but given the continuing weak outlook we now see the RBA ultimately cutting the cash rate to a low of 0.25% with another cut around February next year. This will likely be the absolute bottom though as banks are unlikely to be able to pass on rate cuts beyond that point and negative rates are likely to be counterproductive.
Interestingly, another pointer to a cut on Tuesday is that RBA Governor Lowe is scheduled to speak at a business community dinner after the board meeting just as he did after the June and July meetings when rates were last cut! This presentation will naturally be watched closely in terms of clues regarding future rate moves but we expect him to remain very dovish. The RBA’s Financial Stability Review is expected to express a relatively relaxed stance in relation to the residential property market.
On the data front in Australia, expect private credit growth (Monday) to show a slight uptick driven by owner occupier housing credit, building approvals (Tuesday) to show a 1% bounce after a 10% fall and CoreLogic home price data for September (also Tuesday) to show a 0.9% rise, driven again by Sydney and Melbourne, the August trade surplus (Thursday) to show a sharp fall on the back of the fall in the iron ore price and August retail sales (Friday) to show a 0.7% bounce on the back of the tax refunds.
Outlook for investment markets
Share markets remain at risk of volatility in the months ahead given unresolved issues around trade and Iran, impeachment noise and mixed economic data as we are still in a seasonally weak part of the year for shares. But valuations are okay – particularly against low bond yields, global growth indicators are expected to improve by next year and monetary and fiscal policy are becoming more supportive, all of which should support decent gains for share markets on a 6-12 month horizon.
Low yields are likely to see low returns from bonds once their yields bottom out, but government bonds remain excellent portfolio diversifiers.
Unlisted commercial property and infrastructure are likely to see reasonable returns. Although retail property is weak, lower-for-longer bond yields will help underpin unlisted asset valuations.
The election outcome, rate cuts, tax cuts and the removal of the 7% mortgage rate test are driving a rise in national average capital city home prices driven by Sydney and Melbourne. But beyond an initial bounce, home price gains are likely to be constrained through next year as lending standards remain tight, the record supply of units continues to impact and rising unemployment acts as a constraint.
Cash and bank deposits are likely to provide poor returns as the RBA cuts the official cash rate to 0.5% by early next year.
The A$ is likely to fall further to around US$0.65 as the RBA cuts rates further. Excessive A$ short positions, still high iron ore prices and Fed easing will provide some support though with occasional bounces and will likely prevent an A$ crash.
Subscribe to Oliver's Insights to receive my latest articlesDr Shane Oliver, Head of Investment Strategy and Economics and Chief Economist
While every care has been taken in the preparation of this article, AMP Capital Investors Limited (ABN 59 001 777 591, AFSL 232497) and AMP Capital Funds Management Limited (ABN 15 159 557 721, AFSL 426455) makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of any statement in it including, without limitation, any forecasts. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. This article has been prepared for the purpose of providing general information, without taking account of any particular investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. An investor should, before making any investment decisions, consider the appropriateness of the information in this article, and seek professional advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation and needs. This article is solely for the use of the party to whom it is provided.